| As a lawyer I can only strongly affirm the views expressed here.
Working for a company with many employees, you are enjoying dismissal protection. That means that the employer has to have specific reasons for terminating your contract. Those could be reasons connected with your person (e.g prolonged illness with no sign of recovery), your conduct (e.g calling your employer a four letter word) or reasons connected with the company itself. Even the latter, company-related reason, e.g. redundancy because of severe lack of orders from clients, has to stand the ground of meeting strong criteria. In addition, the employer generally has to make an evaluation of whom to make redundant. Doing so he has to consider comparable employees with a view to protecting the most vulnerable along certain criteria (e.g employee with kids and family to sustain). If there is a work council, it, too, has to play a part in the termination process. The assessment itself as well as the company-related reason will have to stand the test in court, if the termination is challenged in due time, that is.
http://www.trust7.com/en/foren/visa_questions/layoff_-_two_basics
In your case the employer has not cited a single reason but rather threatened to find one.
In order to circumvent the dismissal protection many employers try to get the employee to agree to dissolve the contract sometimes offering a financial incentive in form of a compensation sometimes uttering intimidating threats or both for good measure.
As a matter of experience it is oftentimes best to challenge a termination in court. One has to bear in mind that often, if both parties want to end the contract, a compensation package is best negotiated in court in form of a settlement, even though the employee has generally no formal claim for a compensation as such. As for the compensation itself, there is no minimum or maximum amount, however usually, as a bench mark, it is half of the monthly income multiplied by every year in which the contract has existed. This benchmark is drawn from a change in the law. The change in the law allows the employer who terminates on the ground of company related reasons to bait the employee with a compensation along those lines not to challenge the termination notice in court. If he does, he forfeits the compensation claim. Of course, there are other claims too that need to be addressed such as vacation compensation, etc. Back to the question of challenging a termination notice, it is always advised to challenge it if the employer is using scaring tactics showing that he has a hidden agenda and his reasons cited for the termination of the contract are only a pretext. Also, agreeing with your employer to dissolve the contract has negative impacts on your later claiming social security.
The employer bears high legal risks when terminating the contract with his employee via termination notice. This is the case, because after serving the notice, even though the employee is not attending work (as he has been dismissed and stays at home), he is still entitled to his full pay check if the court later establishes that the cancellation was invalid.
To conclude, it is also not up to the mood of the employer to issue a reference letter about the work you have done. You are entitled to a proper reference letter on termination of your work contract.
Rechtsanwalt_Jain@yahoo.de |