Diego Carbonel | Marc, where have you been all this time?
After all this time of silence, what is indeed moving you to write? My main question is: do you have something TO SAY, rather than arguing AGAINST the things people post here? I just don't remember ANY post from your part in which you presented your ideas, your original beliefs, your thoughts, your reflexions. Until now, all we have received from your part is confused rethoric around a dated leitmotiv: why Germany doesn't need immigration. Note the "doesn't": your arguments have always been on the negative, never on the positive.
After a long parenthesis of silence, well, I was at least intrigued to see what "MarcOS" was posting. And here is what I find: the same old sophisms, the same old approach "I have the truth in my hands", the same old disdain for any other kind of opinions. But indeed, nothing, nothing new. At this point, it is pretty clear then that you will never post an original approach, but rather stick to the old street-fighter discipline: let the other make the move, and I will counter that move with all my arsenal.
Therefore, I feel I need to ask you, Marc: what is indeed your opinion on the subject? I mean, not your counter-opinions, but your vision of the situation. You may say "hey, it is clear I am against immigration", but if it is not too much to ask, could you elaborate a little bit, this time based on your positive beliefs and not in the systematic denigration of other posts here?
In any case, this discussion around immigration allows two approaches: the pragmatic, immediate one, and the long, social, demographical, historical analysis. If we target the immediate, say, the next 100 years, it is clear that in one way or another, Europe needs immigration.
But Marc... if we target the long run one, well, this has leaded Europe - and indeed Germany, in dramatical proportions - many times to the abyss of self-denying. Europe HAS been land of immigrations from the dawn of manhood. This piece of land you call Germany was a corridor for uncountable waves. Before the "modern" germans with this marvelous language you are so proud of, the Romans were here, right? And before them, a myriad of Celtic tribes. And before, and before, through the Neanderthalers and back...
As you surely now, the "germans", those tribes speaking more or less a similar language (think on the Ulfilas Bible), in fact INVADED this land, and not that slowly, pushing the border to the Rhine-Donau line, and then south and south. But in any case: when would you trace the line and say "whoever is in, is German, whoever is out, is auslender? On the 2nd century before Christ? On the fourth after? After Charlemagne? After Barbarossa? After Luther? After Friedrich the Great? After Napoleon? After Bismark? After the 3rd. Reich? After Brandt? After Gorbachev?
In conclusion: personally, I think the discussion "who was here first" takes you nowhere but to an abyss, whether this is in Palestina or in Western Europe. This is what I think, but perhaps it's because I come from South America, where the native population was humilliated in one of the hugest massacres ever by europeans, the same that brought enslaved africans... and still was more or less ready to give it another try on the begining of the XX century. In any case, I cannot help the strongest skepticism grow strong within myself whenever anyone speaks of "I was here first, this is my land". But this is me.
What do you think, Marc? Can you define exactly what is your position?
Otherwise, from your negative posts, one may be forced to think that you really believe in Germania as a static, eternal, natural consequence of history, the crossing point of linguistic supremacy and necessary lebensraum.
Is that true?
Have a nice day,
Diego aka Sudaca.
PS: sorry, looks I am back in shape with the longitude of my posts!
PSS: hey, Dejan, don't go: you DO belong here. You certainly belong to this Forum. |